DeVos is the billionaire sister of Erik Prince, founder of the murderous private mercenary firm, Blackwater, Inc. Like the President, whose foreign policy decisions are compromised by his conflicting foreign financial interests, DeVos has significant financial interests that conflict with her obligation to serve the public interest as the nation’s top education official.
Citing paperwork released by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE), the Center for American Progress notes DeVos “has [substantial] investments in companies that hound students to pay their federal loan debts.” Unfortunately, DeVos was not confronted with that blatant conflict-of-interest during her Senate confirmation hearings because, according to the Center, Senators were not given access to the OGE records until after her confirmation process was completed.
In his August 2018 article in Forbes, Newton bestowed the “Queen of Debt” title after the Secretary of Education pursued policies that facilitated a rise in the level of U.S. student debt to an alarming $1.5 trillion.
One of the principal means utilized by the conflicted DeVos to inflate her own wealth, while burying an entire generation of defrauded students in insurmountable debt, was to indefinitely postpone the “Borrower Defense Regulations” that had been adopted in 2016 by the Department of Education under President Obama. Those regulations were supposed to have gone into effect in July 2017.
The “Borrower Defense Regulations” were enacted in the wake of the collapse of privately-held, for-profit colleges and universities — worthless diploma mills, like the now defunct Corinthian Colleges and the infamously fraudulent Trump University. The scam artists of those private, ostensibly “educational” institutions rake-in exorbitant tuitions paid via direct loans their students are encouraged to obtain from the federal government. Unable to secure employment after graduating with their worthless diplomas from the disreputable private institutions, the students are left facing insurmountable debt, as taxpayers pick up the tab to cover the loans those former students are unable to pay back.
According to an October 28, 2016 Department of Education formal announcement, the Obama-era regulations were expressly designed to protect students and taxpayers from predatory institutions. The 2016 regulations included provisions for debt relief for victimized students and the elimination of contractual provisions by which predatory private schools compel students to waive their right to class action lawsuits and which force students to submit to private arbitration.
In successive rulings, U.S. District Court Judge Randolph Moss has now sided with defrauded student borrowers and against DeVos and the predatory “educational” institutions she invested in prior to becoming the U.S. Education Secretary — a position that placed her in charge of overseeing regulations meant to clean up this fraudulent mess.
DeVos Order was ‘Arbitrary and Capricious’
In July 2017, shortly after the DeVos-led Department of Education issued the first of several orders to delay the “Borrower Defense Regulations”, attorneys from the Public Citizen Litigation Group and Harvard Law School’s Project on Predatory Student Lending filed a complaint [PDF] in the U.S. District Court in Washington D.C. on behalf of Meagan Bauer and Stephano Del Rose (Bauer v. DeVos).
Bauer and Del Rose had each incurred a $40,000 indebtedness for federal loans they received to attend filmmaking classes at the New England Institute of Arts (“NEIA”), a for-profit college. Both plaintiffs seek loan forgiveness by reason of “NEIA’s [alleged] fraud and other misconduct”. But both have been prevented from obtaining debt relief by reason of the stay DeVos imposed on the Department’s “Borrower Defense Regulations” shortly after taking office.
This year, the Bauer student plaintiffs, joined by 19 states and the District of Columbia, filed successful motions for summary judgment in which they contested the legality of the DeVos stay orders.
In a September 12 opinion and order [PDF], Judge Moss ruled that DeVos had not only violated Section 705 of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) but that her decision to stay the “Borrower Defense Regulations” was “arbitrary and capricious.”
The Department, under DeVos, sought to justify the stay by arguing that “if the final regulations are not postponed, institutions would be subject to financial responsibility trigger provisions that could impose substantial costs” on the private institutions. However, the court observed, DeVos “failed to consider how the public interest or the interests of student borrowers would be affected by [the Department’s stay] decision.”
Although Judge Moss agreed with the plaintiffs that DeVos had violated the APA by issuing the stay, he extended the stay until no later than Oct. 28, 2018. That extension was related to a second case, California Association of Private Secondary Schools (“CAPPS”) v. DeVos. In that matter, private schools, that have been profiting from the direct federal lending scheme, challenged the 2016 Department of Education regulations that banned the use of contractual provisions confining students to arbitration. Such arbitration clauses were meant to prevent the type of federal class action lawsuits filed against Trump University. Just days after his election in 2016, Trump settled by agreeing to pay $25 million to his defunct University’s defrauded students.
CAPPS filed a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to prevent the Department from enforcing the regulation that eliminated the ability of predatory “educational” institutions to rely on those arbitration-only contractual clauses.
Earlier this month, on October 16, Judge Moss issued an opinion and order [PDF] in which he denied the relief sought by CAPPS. Because the court did not further extend the stay, defrauded students may now finallly seek debt relief under the Obama-era “Borrower Defense Regulations”.
Julie Murray, a Public Citizen attorney representing the plaintiffs, described this second decision as “a huge win for defrauded borrowers around the country”. Meagan Bauer, the lead plaintiff, added: “I hope these rulings remind the Department of Education of its obligation to care for its citizens who are the future of this country and that it will start to act in the interest of students instead of focusing on lining the pockets of for-profit institutions.”
Youth Vote Matters
The issues surrounding the question of students, predatory lending and debt underscore that a continuation of Republican control of the federal government poses a grave threat to the future financial security of our nation’s youth. Yet, recent polling suggests that young voters may be the age group least likely show up to vote in the November 6th midterms; albeit, more young voters are expected to turnout than in past midterm elections.
The conflict between the public interest and DeVos’ personal financial interests is but one of a myriad of ethical quagmires that exist within the manifestly corrupt Trump Administration and for which Congressional oversight has been sorely lacking.
With their future aspirations for financial security at stake, one would hope that cases like these would motivate maximum turnout by young Americans, leading to a change in control of one or both Houses of Congress.